Search for: "Lilly v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 913
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc   New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm by CFM Admin
October 20, 2023 Clients, Friends, and Associates: As we end the third quarter and enter the fall season, we would like to highlight some of the recent industry updates and occurrences we found to be both interesting and impactful. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:13 am by Mary Anne Peck
The state joins a growing list of GOP-led states that have embraced expanded postpartum Medicaid coverage since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:35 am by John Coyle
This post is by Carlos Manuel Vázquez, a professor of law at Georgetown Law School. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:22 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
In this regard, in its judgment of 12 December 2013 (case C-493/12, Eli Lilly v Human Genome Sciences), the CJEU made the following observations: “30. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:31 am by Emma Snell
Natasha Bertrand and Katie Bo Lillis report for CNN. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
  To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:59 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Upreti first discusses the role of national law in such major IP-related ISDS case, Philip Morris v Uruguay, Eli Lilly v Canada, Bridgestone v Panama, and Einarsson v Canada [also commented by The IPKat here and here]. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 10:30 pm by Drew M. Capuder
Harsco Corporation, 184 W.Va. 734, 403 S.E.2d 751 (1991)); accord Lilly v. [read post]