Search for: "Lines v. Frederick" Results 1 - 20 of 234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Peter Mahler
LP (1st Dept 2011), Stone v Frederick (3d Dept 1997), and Giaimo v EGA Associates (1st Dept 2009), cement the concept that, where the by-laws do not overtly give the president the right to commence litigation, and there is board or shareholder deadlock about the propriety of doing so, the president then lacks the authority to bring an action directly in the name of the corporation. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Trump’s Authoritarian Presidency”Expert Statement Bright Line WatchJohn Carey (John Wentworth Professor in the Social Sciences, Dartmouth College), Gretchen Helmke (Thomas H. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Thomas gave us the answer in his opening paragraph in his brutal dissent in Grutter v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
If anyone notes an error or inconsistency in this time line, please let me know, provide better sources, and ask for a correction. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm by admin
Oral contraception was ascertained for over 10 years before base line, but hair straightener use was ascertained only for one year prior to baseline. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 6:15 am by Stephen Mayeaux
As Frederick Douglass once asked, “What, to the slave, is the 4th of July? [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Alternatively, Dobbs, Bruen, and West Virginia v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm by admin
Professor Schauer’s discussion of statistical significance, covered in my last post,[1] is curious for its disclaimer that “there is no claim here that measures of statistical significance map easily onto measures of the burden of proof. [read post]