Search for: "Lines v. Frederick" Results 41 - 60 of 182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2018, 2:36 pm by Mark Walsh
Frederick urges Kennedy to read the concurring opinion of Justice John Marshall Harlan in the 1961 decision in Lathrop v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 1:44 pm by Mark Walsh
It’s the biggest case of the term, Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
It could have taken the trial to the University of South Dakota School Law, which is about 20 miles from Elk Point but over the Union County line. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 5:21 am by Eugene Volokh
Judge Rovner, who generally takes a narrower view of Second Amendment protections than does the majority, agreed with the bottom line but wrote separately: To the extent that McDonald v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:18 pm by Nora Demleitner
The United States has changed its argument in this line of cases several times. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:11 pm by Walter Olson
Sorry, Justice Ginsburg, but those comments about a candidate whose legal interests might well come before the Court this year were waaaay over the line [Dan Drezner; Bloomberg View editorial; Orin Kerr (“cringe-inducing”)] “In the unlikely (and horrifying) event of Bush-v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:59 am by MBettman
Supreme Court, such as Lujan, and from federal appeals courts, such as Fredericks) Malloy v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 12:21 pm by Ronald Mann
About the only thing clarified by yesterday’s oral argument in Universal Health Services v. [read post]