Search for: "Lines v. Frederick"
Results 61 - 80
of 235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2010, 3:29 am
State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:17 am
Janus v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:51 am
Arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:02 am
” In so concluding, the Court cited with approval Frederick v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:38 pm
No. 403 v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:41 am
"Hamdan v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 12:51 pm
Arguing for the iPhone users, lawyer David Frederick also pushed back against the idea that Illinois Brick should be overruled, stressing that the case establishes a bright-line rule that allows direct purchasers to bring antitrust lawsuits. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:42 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit’s 1995 decision Crow Tribe v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
Frederick, the “BONG HiTS 4 JESUS” case from 2007. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 11:05 am
Most recently, in Cutter v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 3:41 am
In an 1866 meeting where Frederick Douglas and Susan B. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
LP (1st Dept 2011), Stone v Frederick (3d Dept 1997), and Giaimo v EGA Associates (1st Dept 2009), cement the concept that, where the by-laws do not overtly give the president the right to commence litigation, and there is board or shareholder deadlock about the propriety of doing so, the president then lacks the authority to bring an action directly in the name of the corporation. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 1:44 pm
It’s the biggest case of the term, Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:17 pm
No. 403 v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 2:20 pm
Barr and Ovalles v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 10:15 am
This morning, in Agency Insurance v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 10:15 am
This morning, in Agency Insurance v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 8:12 am
” Hailing the ruling, plaintiffs’ counsel David Frederick, Kellogg Huber Hansen Todd Evans & Figel P.L.L.C., Washington, told BNA that “[i]n rejecting a bright-line rule for materiality in securities fraud cases, the Court leaves the door open to investors to plead and prove the wide range of factors that can be important in making reasonable investment decisions. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 4:48 am
That's Tinker v. [read post]