Search for: "Lines v. Frederick" Results 121 - 140 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2011, 3:23 am by Terry Hart
Law professor Frederick Schauer describes this better than I do: There are times when law uses language of its own making, often in  Latin — replevin, assumpsit, quantum meruit, habeas corpus, res judicata — and sometimes even in English—bailment, demurrer, due process, joinder, interpleader, easement. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
In this regard, Para 3.4 (v) of the said Manual reads as follows:"(v) In cases of alleged sex offences such as intercourse with a female child, forcible rape, indecent liberties or perversion, it is important that the victim, as well as the accused, be made available for interview and polygraph examination. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:49 am
Negotiating administrative procedures to administer General Municipal Law Sections 207-a and 207-cRiverhead v Foote, State Sup. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:38 am by Terry Hart
First Amendment scholar Frederick Schauer explains, “[T]he First Amendment, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press provide considerable rhetorical power and argumentative authority. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 9:00 am by John N. Davis
The case is Amazon.com, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Bloomsbury Press, 2010.Civil RightsKF4155 .S77 2010Mendez v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 4:39 pm by David Lat
But we haven’t seen a complaint this juicy since Allgood v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am by Adam Chandler
Frederick, the “BONG HiTS 4 JESUS” case from 2007. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week.  [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm by Erin Miller
Stepping back from our series to find evidence this Term for its underlying thesis, we see Stevens taking a hard line toward even well-meaning but negligent officers of the court.  [read post]