Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED 19 February 1998"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
Since filing the petition, however, Mr. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 7:42 pm
The infant who is the subject of the case has now been in the home of the petitioners since February 21, 1998 without the benefit of a valid adoption consent from the parents or a currently valid pre-adoption certification order. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 8:24 pm
The infant who is the subject of the case has now been in the home of the petitioners since February 21, 1998 without the benefit of a valid adoption consent from the parents or a currently valid pre-adoption certification order. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 6:07 am
In February of 2019, Google petitioned for institution of an IPR challenging several claims of the ‘115 and ‘560 patents wherein the petition relied on the Academic Paper. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
Corp., 972 S.W.2d 63, 65 (Tex. 1998) (per curiam). [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
The appeal was listed for 18 and 19 November 2003. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am
Mr Watson advised that in the event of him receiving instructions to do so, he was willing to excise from the file certain material in order to assist the police inquiry. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
The child was 13 years old, and had no adjudicated father and no father listed on his birth certificate. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:45 am
Delivered and Filed: September 19, 2018. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:44 pm
The appeals court issued a limited remand order on May 18, 2015, allowing Syed an opportunity to petition the trial court to reopen the post-conviction proceedings to have further proceedings on the alibi issue. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
Corp., 972 S.W.2d 63, 65 (Tex. 1998) (per curiam). [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Filed: February 16, 2017. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
So the populations of case opinions that can be found in repositories such as Westlaw, Lexis, Casemaker, Justia, or Google Scholar, are not a representative sample of the universe of cases.And as for the precedent-setting cases in the state supreme court, they were and continue to be hand-picked because courts of last resort exercise discretionary review and their active docket (granted petitions are denominated "causes" in the SCOTX lingo) is anything but a random… [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:26 pm
II, §§ 19, 20. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On February 3, 2005, petitioner filed a complaint against defendants and real parties in interest Wasserman, Comden, Casselman & Pearson, L.L.P., a law firm (WCCP), and certain of its members, including attorneys Steve Wasserman and David Casselman (hereafter collectively real parties). [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Much of the spike in reported spending can be attributed to new registrations ordered by the Justice Department. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
See Cert Petition in Henry v. [read post]
