Search for: "Little Sisters of the Poor v. Burwell" Results 61 - 80 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2017, 11:18 am by Amy Howe
The Supreme Court did not rule on the merits of the plaintiffs’ claim in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
The court recently has shown little concern for women who have lost health insurance coverage for contraception because of its decisions in Hobby Lobby and Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:43 am by Leslie Griffin
This summer, the court, by a 7-2 vote in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
The most famous is Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
.,  brothers, sisters, half-brothers, half-sisters, spouses, ancestors, and lineal descendants] count as a single owner. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by John Ehrett
Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 3:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
Among other complaints of the dissenters, they said that the new ruling went beyond what the full Court had done in January, in allowing a Catholic charity in Colorado, the Little Sisters of the Poor, to avoid becoming involved in the mandate. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:54 am by Amy Howe
Today, by a vote of 7-2, the Supreme Court in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:16 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
” Objections to Contraception The Court’s 7-2 decision in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am by Michele Goodwin
Hobby Lobby Stores, and notably shortly before her death, Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Wang
Earlier this year, the Supreme Court affirmed these regulations in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:53 am by Eric Citron
Sebelius and Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am by Mark Rienzi
These injunctions have been entered in new cases brought by 21 different states, which say that the agencies actually have no power to issue religious exemptions at all, and that exemptions for groups like the Little Sisters of the Poor will harm state governments. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” Thus, Bostock modified by RFRA opens the door to discrimination against LGBTQ employees by individuals, nonprofits, and for-profit organizations.RFRA’s capacity to undermine public health in Hobby Lobby was reinforced this Term in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]