Search for: "Littlejohn v. State" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2017, 7:14 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
If you are new to this, the Second Circuit clarified the rules governing Rule 12 dismissals in employment discrimination cases in 2015, in two cases: Littlejohn v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 6:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" For now, she satisfies the lenient pleading standards under Title VII, as set forth in Littlejohn v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 3:39 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
James Simpson, No. 105,182 (Jefferson)State appealJohn R. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 7:08 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This ruling provides a good summary of the legal standards guiding motions to dismiss under Title VII, reiterating the pro-plaintiff language from Littlejohn v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev., 624 F.3d 685, 690 (5th Cir. 2010) (quoting Littlejohn v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev., 624 F.3d 685, 690 (5th Cir. 2010) (quoting Littlejohn v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 8:13 pm by alexkorotkin
Domestic Relations Law §170(6) sets forth one of the two “no-fault” grounds for divorce in New York State. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 3:05 am
The New York federal district court said it doubted that the claim would survive summary judgment, but ordered plaintiffs to brief the issue first.In Littlejohn v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 8:16 am by Joy Waltemath
Turning to the employee’s sex discrimination claim, which was based on his termination, the court observed that after the Second Circuit’s decision in Littlejohn v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:03 pm by Ryan McKeen
What To Do The fact that the insurance company has to pay for the loss of your car is bedrock Connecticut law (Littlejohn v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
She particularly criticised Richard Littlejohn at the Daily Mail who said that senior BBC employees “stand accused of being complicit in Savile’s crimes on Corporation premises”. [read post]