Search for: "Liu v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 496
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 12:48 pm
Starbucks Corporation (S234969) on whether California wage and hour law recognizes the de minimis doctrine established by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 4:17 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
It says “Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
When Sky v SkyKick leaves rightsholders in limbo.Event ReportAsia Correspondent Tian Liu provides her first report on The Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO)'s 2018 European Practice Committee Conference in Amsterdam: Report on IPO’s 2018 European Practice Committee Conference (1/2). [read post]
9 May 2018, 10:00 pm
However, the BRI standard for AIA trials is different from the standard used in federal district courts and the ITC, which construes patent claims in accordance with the principles that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit articulated in Phillips v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 11:33 am
Pereira v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
As explained below, and for the reasons stated in Justice Cuéllar’s dissent, the DNA Act violates the prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures in the California Constitution. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:20 pm
The case, People v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 3:45 pm
See Manning v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 10:52 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 9:21 am
In the Eastern District of Wisconsin (United States of America v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm
On the same day Nicklin J heard an application in the cases of AXB v BXA and entered default judgment in the case of LJY v Persons Unknown. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:17 pm
HotChalk v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:35 am
“Jurisdiction is not acquired pursuant to CPLR 308(2) unless both the delivery and mailing requirements have been strictly complied with” (Gray-Joseph v Shuhai Liu, 90 AD3d 988, 989; see Washington Mut. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Implications for Public Administration from Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 7:41 am
Liu. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
Liu v Hamptons Golf Course Ltd., 2017 ABCA 303 [29] The restrictive covenants must be interpreted in context, and having regard to the expressed intent of the signatory. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:36 pm
Department of State and U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 11:55 am
I will now discuss the Wuhan (Liu Li v. [read post]
