Search for: "Liu v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2015, 12:59 am
France; Ali Samatar and Others v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:42 pm
Supreme Court entered its opinion in Liu v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:42 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
For example, Justice Clarence Thomas pointed out to Waxman that he was impressed by Liu’s answer to Kagan, in which Liu had argued that ERISA barred only disuniformity related to plan administration, not disuniformity in areas traditionally subject to state regulation. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 12:31 pm
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Goodwin Liu, Associate Justice of the California Supreme Court - San Francisco, CA We are honored to have Justice Liu, the newest member of our state’s highest court, join us to present his keynote address. 2:15 p.m. - 3 p.m. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:20 pm
The case, People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:55 pm
” National Bank v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 10:25 am
Below, Shira Liu, a student at Stanford Law School, recaps last week’s opinion in Mac’s Shell Service, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:04 pm
United States, 130 S. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 2:53 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 5:29 am
So, in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:24 am
Jerry Brown signed SB 416 Tuesday by State Sen. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:15 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
”However, in Liu v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 10:41 am
State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:06 am
In Duran v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
As explained below, and for the reasons stated in Justice Cuéllar’s dissent, the DNA Act violates the prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures in the California Constitution. [read post]
