Search for: "Liu v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 499
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
The case of Feng v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Implications for Public Administration from Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
In Laffitte v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 9:28 pm
(Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:01 am
’ In December 2009, Nobrega had an employee named Wei Liu. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:06 am
Liu, 239 F. 3d 138, 140 (2d Cir. 2000) (quoting United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:58 am
Metropolitan Movers Assoc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 8:13 am
The treaty stated that the agreement would end if the lands became occupied. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:10 pm
Liu v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:34 pm
The first case is Liu v Ma.[1] The plaintiff sought to recognize and enforce a default Chinese judgment (worth RMB 3,900,000) against the defendants. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:58 am
Metropolitan Movers Assoc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:58 am
Metropolitan Movers Assoc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:58 am
Metropolitan Movers Assoc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:58 am
Metropolitan Movers Assoc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 6:25 am
On Monday morning, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Barton v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 6:00 am
With its decision in Morrison v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:03 am
The anti-retaliation provision of the Dodd-Frank Act does not extend beyond U.S. soil, a federal district court in New York ruled, dismissing the retaliation claims of a China-based compliance officer for a German corporation’s Chinese subsidiary (Liu v Siemens, A.G., October 21, 2013, Pauley, W, III). [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
Ou v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:27 am
This is demonstrated by a reply issued by the Chinese Supreme People’s Court in 2006, which provides that judgments issued in Australia cannot be recognized and enforced in China because Australia has not offered reciprocity to Chinese judgments.[1] Liu v Ma & anor [2017] VSC 810 is the first Chinese monetary judgment recognized and enforced in the state of Victoria. [read post]
