Search for: "Livingston v. Davis"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2023, 6:39 am
The Court of Appeals said in Davis v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 11:14 am
Facts: This case (Livingston et al v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Professor Sonia Livingstone and 5Rights Foundation researcher Kruakae Pothong have produced a child rights response to the UK government’s recent consultation, Data: a new direction for the LSE Media Blog. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
Appellate Division, Third Department Improper to discredit Respondent’s denial of paternity on the basis that he never definitively took steps to dissuade the child or anyone else that he was NOT the father In Matter of Montgomery County Dept of Social Services o/b/o Donavin E, v Trini G 195 A.D.3d 1069, 149 N.Y.S.3d 667 (3d Dept.,2021) petitioner commenced a proceeding seeking… [read post]
11 May 2021, 8:22 am
Hover-Davis, Inc., issued on April 27. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
Part V addresses three arguments against universal mask wearing. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:00 am
Livingston v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
” In Davis v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; WALKER and MEIER, JJ. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; WALKER and MEIER, JJ. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Davis, 261 S.W.3d 811, 815 (Tex. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm
LSE’s Sonia Livingstone and Western Sydney University’s Amanda Third have prepared a special issue of New Media and Society: Children and young people’s rights in the digital age: An emerging agenda. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:56 am
Ratner Paul Williams & Laura Livingston, reviewing Lawfare: Law as a Weapon of War, by Orde F. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
Challenge to Will based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence rejectedIN RE ESTATE OF TORNABENDOCKET NO. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm
Having that in mind, I’ll just note that much of the exclusionary rule discussion—led by Judge Reena Raggi—seemed to turn on whether the appropriate standard was announced by the Supreme Court's decision in Davis v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:41 am
In this case, the Court of Appeals holds that the Act does not allow a woman to sue for discrimination that led to a reduced salary.The case is Davis v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:45 am
” In re Davis’ Will, 14 N.J. at 169. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley heard 20 July 2012 (Eady J) [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:00 am
See, e.g., Livingston v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
