Search for: "Livingston v. Story" Results 1 - 20 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2009, 5:16 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Ottawa Citizen and the 2006 House of Lord's decision, Jameel v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Livingstone also stated in his book that the Evening Standard itself had published editorials which repudiated Gilligan’s stories by confirming “there had been no corruption or cronyism at City Hall. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 8:58 pm
 Plaintiffs in the case allege that “Defendants have used a copyrighted photograph from Jonathan Livingston Seagull as their corporate logo, and have used copyrighted excerpts from Jonathan Livingston Seagull, and the copyrighted story and character of Jonathan Livingston Seagull in their advertising, communications with their independent distributors, in their sale and distribution of FLP products, and in the advertising, marketing and… [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 7:11 am by Eric Lipman
Mark Hamblett has the story at the New York Law Journal, and here's a link to the opinion, Byrne v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 12:00 pm by ernst
Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Queensland) v Livingston (1964): Rights of Estate Beneficiaries and Trust Beneficiaries ComparedCharles Mitchell16. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:33 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But if they leave out the rest of the story, the courts will bring in the entire statement. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 11:10 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Friday morning saw a long-scheduled status conference in the case of Hatim et al. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 5:06 pm
Ottawa Citizen and the 2006 House of Lord's decision, Jameel v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:14 am by SHG
  That's pretty much the end of the story. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:09 am
 You can, if you are interested, read more about the facts in the case in the news stories you can find here, here and here. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:51 pm
Rodgers told Livingston that the family dog had scratched him. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:49 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"The Court of Appeals (Livingston, Lynch and Sullivan) reverses and reinstates the verdict. [read post]