Search for: "Lloyd v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 948
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
On 9, 10 and 11 July 2019 there was a trial in the case of Boyo v Lloyds Bank Plc before Anthony Metzer QC (Sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge). [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 6:24 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  The case is from the Amarillo Court of Appeals and is styled, State Farm Lloyds v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
United States The Judge has reduced the damages in the Oberlin college libel case from $44m to $25m to comply with various limits laid down in Ohio law. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:58 am by Alethea Redfern
In his judgement, Mr Justice Hayden emphasised that the ‘defining principle’ of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 was the ‘recognition of the importance of human autonomy’ in the presumption set out at Section 1(2) that ‘a person person must be assumed to have capacity unless it is established that he lacks capacity’.In three applications brought against Serbia and the Ukraine, the European Court of Human Rights declared that the applications were admissible and… [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm by Jonathan Shaub
Two seminal events have occurred in recent days in the ongoing oversight war between the House of Representatives and the Trump administration—and in the ongoing expansion of the doctrine of executive privilege. [read post]
26 May 2019, 9:00 pm by The JAG HUNTER
Foster, Jacksonville, FLGM3 James Plonsky, Van Nuys, CAIC2 Lloyd A. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am by CMS
The justices were also divided as to how to answer this question, with Lord Kerr and Lady Hale agreeing with Lord Carnwath; Lords Lloyd-Jones, Reed and Sumption declining to give a view; and Lord Wilson dissenting. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm by INFORRM
The justices were also divided as to how to answer this question, with Lord Kerr and Lady Hale agreeing with Lord Carnwath; Lords Lloyd-Jones, Reed and Sumption declining to give a view; and Lord Wilson dissenting. [read post]
20 May 2019, 8:17 am by Alethea Redfern
’ Lord Lloyd-Jones, another of the Judges in the majority, remained neutral on this statement. [read post]