Search for: "Lloyd v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 1,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2022] UKSC 5. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 4:33 am
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, et al., No. 09 945, a case under consideration for certiorari by the U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 10:16 am
On 17 July in Equitas Limited v Allstate Insurance Company [2008] EWHC 1671 Mr Justice Beatson handed down his decision on whether Allstate was entitled to a stay of the instant proceedings initiated by Equitas in March 2008.Equitas's action (the English Proceedings), which Allstate sought to stay, concerned the scope of a commutation agreement between Equitas and Allstate; Allstate had reinsured certain Lloyd's syndicates. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:35 am
We previously reported the judgment of Mr Justice Hamblen in Gard Marine & Energy Ltd v LLoyd Tunnicliffe and Ors [click here for our previous blog] concerning the law applicable to a contract of reinsurance. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
R (On The Application of Animal Defenders International) V Secretary of State For Culture, Media and Sport (Respondent) [2008] UKHL 15 (12 March 2008) Norris (Appellant) v Judgments - Government of the United States of America and others (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from Her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 16 (12 March 2008) Brit Syndicates Limited for and on behalf of Brit Syndicate 2987 at Lloyd’s for the 2003 year of… [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 8:02 am
On June 5, 2007, a New York State Court located in Manhattan ruled that various products liability claims relating to ExxonMobil Corporation's defective resin and lubricant products were multiple "occurrences" under liability insurance policies issued to ExxonMobil by Lloyd's of London.The decision, ExxonMobil Corp. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Jessica Jones, Matrix Chambers
An earlier domestic judgment, R v Zardad, also supported the position that a person acting on behalf of a non-State entity may be acting in an official capacity for the purposes of s 134 if the non-State entity “had a sufficient degree of organisation, a sufficient degree of actual control of an area and […] exercised the type of functions which a government or governmental organisation would exercise” [63]. [read post]