Search for: "Lloyd v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 992
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2020, 2:51 am by Guest
When the source of the goods is not specified, the contract is not frustrated when the supplier lets down the seller [CTI Group Inc v Transclear SA (The Mary Nour) [2008] EWCA Civ 856; [2008] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 179] even if it is the sole seller [Intertradex SA v Lesieur Torteaux SARL [1978] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 509]. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:33 pm by Guest
If the parties’ assumptions turn out to be different from ‘state of things as they turned out to be’ frustration kicks in [Mindy Chen Wishart, Ibid.]. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:40 am by sydniemery
United States: CSLI, Third-Party Doctrine, and Privacy in the Twenty-first Century 14 Liberty U. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 9:50 pm by Guest
Compania Internacional De Seguros Del Peru, 1988 (1) Lloyd’s Rep 116, determined the ‘seat’ of arbitration to be India. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:25 pm by Unknown
United States (Trust Relationship; Arizona-Florida Land Exchange Act)Adams v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:03 am by Lisa Meller
The statement of facts for the third party’s cargo stated that the bill of lading quantity was 6,014.906 MT. [read post]
The significance of this case should also be considered alongside the Court of Appeal’s judgment in another data protection-related claim, Richard Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (“Lloyd”) (see our summary of that decision here). [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:33 am by Keily Blair
In situations where a representative action (such as that used in Google v Lloyd) are either inappropriate or the requirements of CPR 19.6[1] cannot be demonstrated, this provides claimants and lawyers with another potential route to court. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
  United States Netflix has won a defamation case for the show When They See Us, which tells the story of the Central Park Five. [read post]