Search for: "Locke Manufacturing Companies v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2008, 8:23 pm
A Supreme Court ruling for Wyeth in Levine v Wyeth would nationalize the Michigan disaster and prevent all United States citizens from pursuing big pharmacuetical companies for the devastating consequences of bad drugs. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 9:26 am by Steven Cohen
SILICA COMPANY et al – United States District Court – Middle District of Pennsylvania – August 23, 2022) involves a products liability action. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 12:42 pm
S., at 457, and “reaches compo­nents that are manufactured in the United States but assembled overseas,” Life Technologies, 580 U. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm by Andy Nikolopoulos
Specifically, patent protection is acquired through a public application process with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 8:02 pm by Larry
United States sets right a very troubling scope decision from the Department of Commerce concerning helical spring lock washers ("HSLW") from China. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 1:32 pm by Mike Mireles
  ION “manufactured the components for [a] competing system and then shipped them to companies abroad. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:40 am
DataCard brought actions for patent and trade mark infringement against Eagle, a relatively small company that sells card printers manufactured by a range of different manufacturers – including DataCard. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 5:23 am by Sean Wajert
” labeling of lock sets that allegedly contain foreign-made parts or involved foreign manufacture. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 10:50 am by Francesca Procaccini
” In the second half of his decision, Orenstein distinguishes the principle case the government appears to consistently rely on when requesting these types of orders: United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:34 pm by Gregory Winsky
LG Electronics; and that the sale outside of the United States of an article covered by a US patent does not exhaust the rights of the patent holder as against the purchaser of that article on the purchaser’s importation of that article into the United States, notwithstanding the 2013 copyright decision of the Supreme Court in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 9:43 pm by Jennifer Granick
Perhaps raising the felony bar resolves some of these problems, but only if the statute is also amended to ensure that the government cannot aggravate the sentence by stacking convictions from the same course of conduct, as it did in United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm by John Floyd
Represent or supervise the representation of the United States Government in the Supreme Court of the United States and all other courts, foreign and domestic, in which the United States is a party or has an interest as may be deemed appropriate. [read post]