Search for: "Locke v. Mitchell" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2019, 10:44 am by beckygillespie
Welch, Mitchell, Hazel, and Yarnell celebrate with Dean Thomas J. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:11 am by CMS
Mitchell Abbott, trainee in the dispute resolution team at CMS, offers comment on the decision of the Supreme Court in the matter of Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited [2018] UKSC 24: “Modern litigation rarely raises truly fundamental issues in the law of contract. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:37 am by Lorene Park
On April 26, the Kentucky Supreme Court reversed summary judgment in favor of an employer that fired an employee for keeping a gun in his car (Mitchell v University of Kentucky). [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:15 am by Dave
HHJ Mitchell quashed that decision, finding that Reg 6(2) operates when a person is no longer working, ie if the illness happens after the applicant lost his job and even if the illness was unrelated to his work; and that he was bound by the decision in FB v Secretary of State for Work  [2010] UKUT 447 (IAC) to find that temporary in para (a) meant not permanent.  [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:15 am by Dave
HHJ Mitchell quashed that decision, finding that Reg 6(2) operates when a person is no longer working, ie if the illness happens after the applicant lost his job and even if the illness was unrelated to his work; and that he was bound by the decision in FB v Secretary of State for Work  [2010] UKUT 447 (IAC) to find that temporary in para (a) meant not permanent.  [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:45 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 12303, Jan. 6, 2016) and dismissed a claim by an inmate (a rabbi) that his kosher diet requirements were not adequately accommodated.In Mitchell v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 1:28 pm by Freddy I. Fonseca
Thus, Judge Mitchell opined that Apple’s failure to lock out the driver did “nothing more than create the condition that made Plaintiffs’ injuries possible. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:05 am
The court concluded, however, that the state had not shown that a total ban on smudging ceremonies is the least restrictive means of furthering the compelling interest in safety and security.In Mitchell v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 10:04 am by CPLEAadmin
R. v Fearon: Can Police Search a Cellphone upon Arrest? [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm by Giles Peaker
The claimant’s evidence was that there were six men and her and the lock on the shared bathroom was broken. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
At Medium, Katy Naples-Mitchell urges the justices to review Johnson v. [read post]