Search for: "Locke v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,911
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2014, 6:23 am
This was a result of a notification system built into the iPhones that automatically displays missed calls and text messages on the main screen even when the phone is password protected and locked. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:00 pm
Supreme Court granted cert in today, Locke v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 1:23 pm
The Appeals Court explains that in March 2008, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) authorized the states of Oregon, Washington and Idaho to kill up to 85 California sea lions annually at Bonneville Dam. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:59 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 6:56 am
Simply put, the State of New York ... [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:07 pm
People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:58 pm
In a recent Florida case, Davila v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:46 am
The post State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:32 am
" But here's what I can't get past: if we really don't have any good evidence to offer against someone we're keeping under lock and key, we shouldn't be keeping that person under lock and key. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 1:59 pm
Locke v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 10:00 am
Finding that even were the educator justified in removing the student from the classroom, his actions in locking the student out of the room in a state of distress and leaving him in the hallway without adequate supervision, violated school policy.The Appellate Division said that imposing a penalty of a 15-day suspension from employment did not shock its sense of fairness, citing Matter of Ghastin v New York City Dept. of Educ., 169 AD3d 507.The decision is… [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 10:00 am
Finding that even were the educator justified in removing the student from the classroom, his actions in locking the student out of the room in a state of distress and leaving him in the hallway without adequate supervision, violated school policy.The Appellate Division said that imposing a penalty of a 15-day suspension from employment did not shock its sense of fairness, citing Matter of Ghastin v New York City Dept. of Educ., 169 AD3d 507.The decision is… [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 8:46 am
Local Ad Link v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:55 pm
Citing its 2002 decision in Timmons v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:21 am
Mountain States Tel. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:18 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 5:01 am
Court of Appeals has just made clear in Alphonso Owens v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:36 am
From the National Law Journal: an opinion piece on the upcoming case before the Supreme Court, Locke v. [read post]
