Search for: "Lockhart v. Nelson"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Michigan – which held that a finding of insufficient evidence precludes retrial under the Double Jeopardy Clause even if the finding is based on a legally erroneous analysis – or the cases cited in Evans, overruled Lockhart v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 7:38 pm
Michigan – which held that a finding of insufficient evidence precludes retrial under the Double Jeopardy Clause even if the finding is based on a legally erroneous analysis – or the cases cited in Evans, overruled Lockhart v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 4:39 pm
Bartee won in State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:07 pm
Relying on Matter of Campbell v Pesce (60 NY2d 165), the Court held thatAlthough the constitutional Double Jeopardy Clauses do not bar a second prosecution where the prior judgment of conviction has been vacated upon the defendant's motion or appeal because of an error in the proceedings (see Lockhart v Nelson, 488 US 33, 38; United States v Tateo, 377 US 463, 465-467), the 2003 judgment of conviction has never been vacated. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:12 am
Nelson, 488 U.S. 33 (1988). [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 2:28 am
Further Lockhart v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 12:49 pm
"Justice Carrico joined in the dissent in the case of Lockhart v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 5:37 am
See Lockhart v. [read post]
