Search for: "Lockhart v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2016, 8:02 pm
United States(here). [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
It is the defendant’s contention that judgment was obtained in violation of a right of his right under the constitution of this state or of the United States pursuant to C.P.L. 440.10(1)(h). [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:10 am
United States, No. 14-8358. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 6:42 am
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:57 am
United States (1983), and Young v. [read post]
8 Dec 2005, 5:33 am
UNITED STATES (04-881), 376 F.3d 1027, affirmed. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 3:39 pm
This time, the decision is Lockhart Textiles Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:43 am
” Tuesday’s other case was Lockhart v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:46 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:24 am
” At Slate, Judith Schaeffer looks back at comments about Loving v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:39 pm
On Wednesday, ACCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 2:33 am
And in Lockhart v. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 12:54 pm
Unites States — conviction of state-law sex abuse crime not involving a minor as a basis for mandatory minimum sentence for child pornography under federal law Torres v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:36 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:24 am
Further, since the USAG has not issued regulations as to cases like these, a real question of whether a retroactive application is permissible or a ex post facto violation.7-30-2008 Ohio:DAYTON, Ohio -- A United States District Court Judge in Dayton has upheld the constitutionality of the 2006 federal law used to punish sex offenders who fail to register.Gregory Lockhart, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio, and James Wahlrab,… [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:23 am
The first is in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:15 am
Commentary on Lockhart v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
United States, characterizing it as “one of several recent signs that ideology does not always fuel the justices’ decisions. [read post]