Search for: "Lockridge v. State"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2015, 5:03 am
While Lockridge's appeals were pending, an interesting thing happened: the SCOTUS decided Alleyne v United States which held that a judgment of sentence could not be based on a fact that: a) defendant did not admit or, b) was determined to exist beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury.In last week's opinion, the Supreme Court, addressing defendant's Alleyne challenge to his sentence, held that Michigan's mandatory sentencing guidelines were unconstitutional… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 7:05 am
As recently stated by this Court in People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 11:23 am
On October 8, 2009, the Court of Appeals approved for publication its decision in Lockridge v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:54 am
Eric Lockridge and Glenn M. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:29 am
See Shreve Land Constructors, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:33 pm
” In Rotkiske v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 2:48 pm
For example, in Carrieri v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:11 am
The Michigan Supreme Court, in the case of People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2105), determined that deviations from the sentencing guidelines must be based upon reasonableness. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:23 pm
Lockridge, 403 U. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:53 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:25 pm
Lockridge, When Is a Use In Commerce a Noncommercial Use? [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
Abbott, Florida State University College of Law John A. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
TOXIC BURDENS AND STATE RESPONSIBILITY In the 1980s, the concept of environmental inequality emerged to stand for the simple premise that environmental degradation does not affect everyone equally. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 9:22 am
People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2015). [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 9:22 am
People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2015). [read post]
