Search for: "Loftis v. Loftis"
Results 1 - 20
of 251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2010, 7:52 am
LOFTIS, Respondent and Appellee, v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 8:16 am
” Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 8:00 pm
By February 2016, when Locatelli was on a month-to-month lease, Laboz issued a notice to vacate by the end of April, but Locatelli remained in place and a holdover proceeding ensued.Locatelli argued his unit was subject to rent stabilization (and that he was protected from eviction), even though a previous tenant had sold the occupancy rights to the landlord; relying on a 2009 Appellate Division, First Department, decision (Acevedo v Piano Bldg), in support of that position. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 1:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 2:31 pm
At issue in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:20 am
From Media Law Prof Blog:The closely watched case of Taus v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 7:32 am
The closely watched case of Taus v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:43 am
Ltd. v Tittmann Solar GmbH [2011] EWPCC 17 (3 May 2011) [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 3:08 pm
I recently had occasion to delve into a new area of research as I prepared to moderate a faculty workshop at the University of Illinois with the lofty title "Indigenous Subjects in Imperial Law: Johnson v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:58 am
Nussbaum COMMENT: PARENTS INVOLVED IN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS V. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 12:23 pm
ScielePharma Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 1:31 pm
Ellrich v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 7:16 am
I love the rhetorical device — must be a Greek name for it — of heading into something lofty or deep by portraying the reader as someone who's already thinking about it on that level.Volokh explains Greenwood and proceeds to State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 5:25 am
Tenants Assn. v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 6:25 am
While you'll find legal textbooks filled with lofty (and often unintelligible) analysis on the topic, in its simplest form, a "duty of care" will arise when it is reasonably foreseeable that an individual will be harmed by your actions or omissions.The question presented in Jimenez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:15 am
But the Federal Circuit’s decision in Lite-Netics, LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:15 am
But the Federal Circuit’s decision in Lite-Netics, LLC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 10:16 am
” Here it is, in all its lofty-worded glory: I am the crucible of the future. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:55 am
That was true in today’s unanimous opinion, authored by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in Bruce v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 12:09 pm
It wasn't Henry V at Agincourt. [read post]
