Search for: "Loftis v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In Connick v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
In Connick v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:16 am
Case Name: Jackson Hole Mountain Resort Corp. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 10:13 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2015) Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative in New Delhi, has written a report on the recent Supreme Court of India case, Reserve Bank of India v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 2:26 pm
What is the point of all of the deliberation and debate (with examples and counterexamples, asserted and denied), and the crafting and drafting and redrafting of constitutional provisions, if those provisions will shortly be interpreted in terms of lofty principles with implications (to be enforced, by judges, against democratic majorities) that the enactors never intended, imagined, or desired? [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:28 pm
(quoting United States v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:01 am
At times, the parties’ positions have matched this lofty rhetoric. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:01 am
At times, the parties’ positions have matched this lofty rhetoric. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am
Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 9:42 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 6:24 am
[9] III: The Judiciary Versus the Corporate Sector For the supposed lofty stature and cachet of a judicial office, the comparison to starting salaries in the larger legal markets is humbling. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:52 pm
Two years later, Bush v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:45 am
This lofty standard means I need a lot of good evidence to prevail. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 4:21 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, on January 23 granting EPA’s motion to dismiss American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:57 pm
(D.I. 535)Footnote 6 is relevant to Teva v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:38 pm
Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:41 am
The right to effective assistance of counsel isnot just a procedural right; it's not just lofty words in a Supreme Courtdecision. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 4:52 am
But § 1983 only applies to state actors. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm
Supreme Court confirmed in Barron v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
By Michael TarrantYanmar American Corp. v. [read post]
