Search for: "Logan v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 7:59 am
The case concerns the President’s authority to detain individuals lawfully within the United States without trial on suspicion of conspiracy to engage in terrorism. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit limited recovery to the attorney's cost. 472 F. 3d 1370 (2006). [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege… [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:39 pm
United States (06-6911), and as amicus supporting petitioners in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928). [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
The United States has done so much for Germany in the 20th century. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 7:41 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 3:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Norman Logan v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:16 pm
Nelson v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 9:30 am
United States; granted Feb. 20, 2007, argued Oct. 30, 2007) Shortest amount of time: 96 days (Meacham v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 3:14 pm
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 7:17 am
This list was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:37 am
United States, No. 06-6911, to a Justice whose last name begins with a J. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 2:29 am
United States, 60 F.3d 1005 (C.A.2 1995) (same), with United States v. [read post]
