Search for: "Lohr v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
We reviewed it, and were somewhat taken aback that – after the court in Desiano v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Sure, we'd love it if one or more of the Supreme Court's opinions in pending cases were to do away with the Lohr language altogether, but we're not holding our breath. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
  PLAC was of course involved in the ensuing major drug- and device-specific Supreme Court preemption cases – win or lose:  Lohr, Buckman, Riegel, Kent, Levine, etc.Take Daubert. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1352-53 (Cal. 1996); Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1351 n.2 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Superior Court, 231 P.2d 26, 28 (Cal. 1951); Wright v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 3:00 pm by Russell Beck
Misa Stefen Koller Ward LLP, No. 30201600850385CUBTCJC, Superior Court of California, County of Orange. [read post]