Search for: "London v. London"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2010, 3:42 am
Mayor of London (on behalf of the Greater London Authority) v Hall and others [2010] EWCA Civ 817; [2010] WLR (D) 195 “The Mayor of London was entitled to an order for possession and an injunction against a number of defendants requiring them to leave a square opposite Parliament, even though title to the land was vested in the Crown, since it was implicit in ss 384 and 385 of the Greater London Authority Act 1999, which gave the Mayor complete… [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 6:07 am
The New Metrocab Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lord Justices Kitchin and Floyd) The London Taxi Corporation Ltd (t/a The London Taxi Company) v Frazer-Nash Research Ltd and Another [2017] EWCA Civ 1729 (1 Nov 2017) In The London Taxi Corporation Ltd (t/a The London Taxi Company) v Frazer-Nash Research Ltd and Another [2016] EWHC 52 (Ch) (20 Jan 2016) Mr Justice [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:44 am
Transport for London (London Underground Ltd) v Spirerose Ltd (in administration) [2009] UKHL 44; [2009] WLR (D) 273 “Where permission for the redevelopment of the claimant's land would on the balance of probability have been granted as at the valuation date, the Lands Tribunal had not been entitled to value the land on the basis that [...] [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 2:42 am
Regina (A) v Croydon London Borough Council; Regina (M) v Lambeth London Borough Council Supreme Court "Where social workers disputed an unaccompanied asylum seeker’s claim to be under the age of 18, and so entitled to local authority accommodation, the question of age was an objective fact subject, in the event of challenge, to determination by the [...] [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 1:46 am
R (A) v Croydon London Borough Council; R (M) vLambeth London Borough Council [2009] UKSC 8; [2009] WLR (D) 342 "Where an asylum seeker’s claim to be under the age of 18 (and so entitled to accommodation under s 20(1) of the Children Act 1989) was disputed by the local authority who would have to provide [...] [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:11 am
New London... [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:11 am
New London... [read post]
7 Feb 2006, 11:58 pm
In Kelo v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:24 am
Irrelevance of ‘on' or ‘over' Wolman v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:10 am
Camden London Borough Council v Stafford [2012] EWCA Civ 839; [2012] WLR (D) 184 “A notice under section 128 of the Housing Act 1996 seeking an order for possession of a dwelling let under an introductory tenancy could not be conditional. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:07 am
Serco Ltd (t/a Serco Docklands) v National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers; London and Birmingham Railway Ltd (t/a London Midland) v Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen [2011] EWCA Civ 226; [2011] WLR (D) 72 “Where a trade union proposed to take industrial action there was no obligation on the union for the purpose of section 230(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 to explain any more than how… [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:28 pm
In Sibthorpe & Morris v London Borough of Southwark [2011] EWCA Civ 25 the Court of Appeal declined to strike down as unlawful (on the basis of champerty) CFAs where the claimants’ solicitors agreed to indemnify the claimants against adverse costs orders. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
New London ten years ago this June. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:19 am
Regina (T) v Merton London Borough Council: [2012] EWHC 2055 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 256 “Paragraph 65 of the Special Guardianship Guidance required a local authority to consider the National Fostering Network’s minimum allowances paid in relation to foster carers and to use them as a starting point when determining the level of financial support payable to a person acting in the capacity of a special guardian pursuant to the provisions of section 14F… [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:19 am
Bubb v Wandsworth London Borough Council: [2011] EWCA Civ 1285; [2011] WLR (D) 323 “A county court judge hearing an appeal on a point of law under section 204 of the Housing Act 1996, against a review of whether a local housing authority owed a duty to a homeless person under the 1996 Act, had no jurisdiction to find the relevant primary facts for himself. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:40 pm
London v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:25 am
Hackney London Borough Council v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8; [2011] WLR (D) 7 “Where a court had made an order for possession against a tenant in his absence, on an application to set aside that order under CPR r 3.1 the court should take all the circumstances into account under r 3.9, where the tenant could show for the purposes of r 39.3(5) that he had acted promptly when he found out about the possession order, had a good reason for not attending the trial and had a… [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:46 am
Boreh v Ealing London Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 1176; [2008] WLR (D) 334 “The suitability of accommodation offered by a local housing authority was not to be judged exclusively by reference to its condition at the time of the offer, but could and should take into account any adaptations or alterations that were proposed to be made. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:19 am
Greenweb Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council; [2008] WLR (D) 286 “On the proper interpretation of ss 14(1) and 15 (3) of the Land Compensation Act 1961 the amount of compensation payable for compulsory acquisition of vacant land on which Victorian houses had stood prior to their destruction during the Second World War should be based on the assumption that planning permission had been granted for specified development even though planning permission for such… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:47 am
Brent London Borough Council v Fuller [2011] EWCA Civ 267; [2011] WLR (D) “It bore repetition that in unfair dismissal disputes it was for the employer to take the decision whether or not to dismiss an employee; for the employment tribunal to find the facts and decide whether, on an objective basis, the dismissal was fair or unfair; and for the Employment Appeal Tribunal (and the ordinary courts hearing employment appeals) to decide whether a question of law arose from the… [read post]
