Search for: "London v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2010, 5:05 am
LB Croydon v Shanahan [2010] EWCA Crim 98 Ms Shanahan was tried on three offences under section 111A(1A) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 5:05 am
LB Croydon v Shanahan [2010] EWCA Crim 98 Ms Shanahan was tried on three offences under section 111A(1A) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 5:55 am
Dec 7 Social Security Announces New Compassionate Allowances Condition Dec 6 When can an employer ask an applicant to “self-identify” as having a disability? [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:36 am
Two HB decisions from the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeals Chamber have appeared, which are interesting because they demonstrate the approach of the Tribunal to the construction of the HB Regs (Torbay Borough Council v RF [2010] UKUT 7 (AAC) (14 January 2010)) and the Tribunal's approach to appeal grounds (HN v London Borough of Brent [2009] UKUT 289 (AAC) (11 December 2009)). [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:36 am
Two HB decisions from the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeals Chamber have appeared, which are interesting because they demonstrate the approach of the Tribunal to the construction of the HB Regs (Torbay Borough Council v RF [2010] UKUT 7 (AAC) (14 January 2010)) and the Tribunal's approach to appeal grounds (HN v London Borough of Brent [2009] UKUT 289 (AAC) (11 December 2009)). [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 6:25 am
The recent criminal case of R. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
Barber v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
Barber v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 5:35 am
As a secure tenant of the housing authority, this was in the form of a rent rebate, rather than a payment of a rent allowance, section 134(1A) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 1:22 pm
Jessica Zhang wrote on the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Hamama v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:11 am
Mark MacCarthy handicaps the Epic v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
This case laid out a set of principles which effectively render unlawful any decision based on a discrete element of the Immigration Rules which is placed beyond Parliament’s scrutiny and left to the “unfettered judgment of the rule-maker…criteria affecting individuals’ status and entitlements which…have not themselves been tendered for parliamentary scrutiny ( see Sedley LJ at para 33 of R v Secretary of State for Social Services ex p… [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Access to recorded classes will be controlled via a secure course management platform, such as ANGEL, and will be restricted to students enrolled in the recorded course, the professor, and those University IIT personnel necessary to maintain the system. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:50 pm
The High Court also ruled that the action of the University was administratively unreasonable. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:23 pm
Jakimaviciute, R (On the Application Of) v Hammersmith And Fulham London Borough Council [2014] EWCA Civ 1438 Eligibility for allocation list, reasonable preference and homelessness. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 10:19 am
Denry Okpor v London Borough of Lewisham, Bromley County Court 25 October 2011 [Transcript not publicly available] Adam Wagner represented Mr Okpor in this case. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 8:06 am
In Lozano v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 11:22 am
Well, the Supreme Court has held, in ISKCON v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:02 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 29737-20 Imperial College London v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27808-20 Ross v Bishop’s Stortford Independent, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation Judgments The judgment of Jay J in Napag Trading Ltd & Ors v Gedi Gruppo Editoriale SPA & Anor [2020] EWHC 3034 (QB) is now available on Bailii. [read post]
