Search for: "London v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 4,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2010, 4:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
City of New London, and Prof. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
A long-running saga came to an end at the High Court in London on 7 October 2011, in Adelson v Anderson [2011] EWHC 2497 (QB). [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 8:30 am
City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 11:24 am
In Elektrim SA (In Bankruptcy) v Vivendi Universal (& Ors) [2008] EWHC 2155 (Comm) the claimant and defendant companies had entered into an investment agreement governed by Polish law, which contained an arbitration clause providing for arbitration in London. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:21 am by David Canton
For the London Free Press – August 9, 2010 Read this on Canoe Case involves actions undertaken by insurer State Farm on behalf of a client The Federal Court of Canada recently released an important decision on the parameters of “commercial activity” under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA): State Farm v Privacy Commissioner. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:29 pm
The family relocated to Belgium in March 2006, although by the autumn of 2007 they lived in London, Belgium and Belfast.4. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 3:06 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Yetkin v London Borough of Newham [2010] EWCA Civ 776 (13 July 2010) Badger Trust v The Welsh Ministers [2010] EWCA Civ 807 (13 July 2010) Ghadami & Anor v Lyon Cole Insurance Group Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 767 (13 July 2010) FlooHorridge (t/a Newford Parts Centre) v Downshire House (Reproductions) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 777 (13 July 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Willett & Anor v R. [2010] EWCA Crim… [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:03 am by Anthony Fairclough
The London Borough of Haringey could have made up the shortfall in funding, but decided against this. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:47 pm by Tim Zinnecker
Assume, in response to the Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
The cases examined raise a broad range of important issues across the law of tort, including such diverse areas as acts of state and public nuisance, as well as central questions relating to the tort of negligence. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 12:43 pm by David Snyder
It also claims that Trump stated his opinion regarding the Supreme Court case Kelo v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:32 pm
L&Q -v- Ansell appears to state that, once the arrears and costs set out in the Possession Order have been paid, the occupier ceases to be a ‘tolerated trespasser’ in the sense of Burrows because their occupation is no longer subject to s.85 Housing Act 1985 - either in terms of execution of the order or possible application for variation of the order. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:11 pm by Ronald London
  Chisea v. 24x7digital thus becomes a case to watch for its potential to provide such guidance. [read post]