Search for: "London v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 3,558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2022, 3:52 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 07/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard… [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm
United States On 31 January 2022, the EARN IT Act was reintroduced to the Senate by Senator Richard Blumenthal and 18 co-sponsors from both parties. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm
The Court of Appeal decision in Patel v London Borough of Hackney (2021) EWCA Civ 897 (our note) was also considered. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 1:14 pm
Related Cases: Williams v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:18 am
On Wednesday 2nd February, the UKSC will hand down judgment in R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited). [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 10:48 am
See US v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 9:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
And it rightly criticises the separation of powers idea as inapt in the modern administrative state . [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
When you and I, and Cindy first got involved with this work, we were really worried about state actors controlling speech. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:06 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar… [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 6:35 am
Haier I and Sisvel v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 7:03 am
Blinken will meet with Foreign Minister Sergey V. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 2:34 pm
From Zhou v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:21 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar… [read post]
15 Jan 2022, 1:17 pm
Kumarasamy v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
That’s the position of the states that are hostile to President Biden, and about half the states of the Union signed on to a brief challenging this rule. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 8:43 pm
We're very close now to the InterDigital v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 12:03 pm
[v].) [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
Julia Hörnle, Professor of Internet Law, CCLS, Queen Mary University of London[1] It is now well known that internet users are widely tracked and profiled by a range of actors and the advancements in data science mean that such tracking and profiling is increasingly commercially profitable[2]. [read post]
