Search for: "London v. State" Results 641 - 660 of 3,533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2021, 3:42 am by Neil Wilkof
Scott Hallsworth is a renowned Australian chef who created and opened a chain of London-based restaurants in 2013 under the mark KUROBUTA. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:38 am by CMS
Background The appellant – KBR, Inc – was a company incorporated in the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 6:29 am by Florence Campbell Jones
”[8] To discuss how this decision may affect your business operations, please contact Anupreet Amole of our London office or your usual Brown Rudnick adviser. ___________ [1] R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2021] UKSC 2 (https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2018-0215-judgment.pdf) [2] R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 5:30 am by Elin Hofverberg
; FALQs: Brexit Referendum; and The UK’s Legal Response to the London Bombings of 7/7. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:15 am by Vassilis Mavrakis
Background The M/V Majesty was carrying 25,000 mt of rice under a voyage charterparty on an amended Synacomex 90 form. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 1:09 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
Continuing the theme of balancing copyright and other fundamental rights, from this Kat’s previous book review, she now turns to Emily Hudson’s Drafting Copyright Exceptions: From the Law in Books to the Law in Action, which was also nominated in the IPKat book of year awards for best copyright book.Law in books v law in action Hudson, Reader at King’s College London, introduces her book by stating that we need a new paradigm through which to view… [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Supreme Court decision holding that plaintiffs suing a foreign government under the statutory exception for state-sponsored terrorism can seek punitive damages for terrorism. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Supreme Court decision holding that plaintiffs suing a foreign government under the statutory exception for state-sponsored terrorism can seek punitive damages for terrorism. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
”  However, the facts of the CJEU case cited in support of this proposition, Marinari v Lloyds Bank (1995), concerned a series of events which took place in Manchester, culminating in the claimant’s arrest by the police in England, ver [read post]