Search for: "Long v. Giles"
Results 61 - 80
of 202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2017, 1:30 pm
Thomas v Lambeth LBC, County Court at Central London, 16 March 2017 This is a s.204 appeal in the County Court of a vulnerability decision by Lambeth. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 11:19 am
NRAM plc v X [Name redacted by request]. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:18 am
by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:12 pm
Lawal has lived in the property for some 39 years and is now 76; in other words, a long-time connection with the property. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 11:58 am
" (Giles v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 2:14 pm
Birmingham City Council v Wilson [2016] EWCA Civ 1137 In Pieretti v Enfield LBC [2010] EWCA Civ 1104 (our note) the Court of Appeal held that under (the predecessor to) the Equality Act, in the course of Housing Act 1997 Part VII inquiries, a reviewing officer was required to carry out inquiries into an applicant’s disability that the Housing Act 1996 had not previously required, i.e. where the applicant had not raised the issue but the reviewing… [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:56 pm
Barakate v LB Brent. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 3:41 pm
S Butt v London Borough of Hackney. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 3:52 am
Some might think that Atkins v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
L, the Second Claimant, suffers from a range of disabilities including autism, global development delay, learning difficulties, long-standing ataxia and uncontrolled epilepsy. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
The question, in large part, was the significance of Lord Neuberger’s judgment in Hotak v Southwark London Borough Council; Kanu v Southwark London Borough Council [2016] AC 811, at paras 78 and 79 “78. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:53 pm
The problem here was the high threshold of evidence set out in R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2014] EWHC 218 (Admin), reported at [2014] ICR 498, R (Tabbakh) v Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 827, and the second Unison case, R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor (No. 2) [2014] EWHC 4198 (Admin). [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 12:22 pm
Not long afterwards, the second respondent arrived at the flat. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 5:08 pm
Following R (Jakimaviciute) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2014] EWCA Civ 1438 [our report] and Alemi, R (on the application of) v Westminster City Council [2015] EWHC 1765 (Admin) [our report], it was not permissible to set qualifying [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:03 pm
Ahmad v Newham [2009] PTSR 632 was not relevant where the issue was discrimination, rather than relative allocation of preference. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm
Panayiotou v Waltham Forest and Smith v Haringey. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:25 pm
The “upper level bed space” has a strip of 16cm wide x 2m long which has a head height of 5ft or more. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
While the period between first approach and interview may be long in some cases, this in itself was not arguably unlawful, given that an initial assessment had been carried out. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:43 pm
Adopting this view would mean walking back from Giles v. [read post]
