Search for: "Long v. Odell" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
After a long and distinguished career as a popular public servant, first as a councillor, then then as a TD, and finally as a Minister, Pat Carey is now a public affairs consultant. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Indeed, the kind of Norwich Pharmacal order sought by the plaintiff in Muwema had been granted in the High Court in London as long ago as 2008 (see Applause Store Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB) (24 July 2008)) and was recently granted in Nova Scotia in Olsen v Facebook 2016 NSSC 155 (CanLII) (17 June 2016)). [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The City of New York waited too long to try to amend its third-party complaint. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am by INFORRM
A cause of action is “a factual situation the existence of which entitles one person to obtain from the court a remedy against another person” (Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232, 242-243 (Diplock LJ); Roberts v Gill [2011] 1 AC 240, [2010] UKSC 22 (19 May 2010) [41] (Lord Collins); Murphy v O’Toole [2014] IEHC 486 (17 October 2014) [57]-[58] (Baker J); see also PR v KC [2014] IEHC 126 (11 March 2014) [36] (Baker J), but note Clarke v… [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:24 pm by Sheppard Mullin
” If the request is “non-routine,” then it constitutes a claim under the CDA so long as “it be (1) a written demand, (2) seeking, as a matter of right, (3) the payment of money in a sum certain. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
However, this is a long way from saying that such a general bad reputation renders a plaintiff libel-proof. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
 Smith v TalkTalk Telecom Group plc [2022] EWHC 1311 (QB) (27 May 2022) concerned claims for damages for both breaches; whilst Sterritt v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2022] NIQB 43 (09 June 2022) concerned the privacy of one of the hackers involved in the second breach. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:06 am by INFORRM
The UK’s Ministry of Justice has announced its long-awaited consultation on the reform of the UK’s libel laws. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Moreover, Fitzgerald went further still, and argued simply that the Constitution could provide a right to general damages for infringement of privacy rights “because there is a long history of general damages for breach of constitutional rights”. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
A long-running review of defamation was concluded by the Defamation Act, 2009(also here), which came into force on 1 January 2010. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:36 am by INFORRM
For example, there was much simplistic reference to the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in von Hannover v Germany 59320/00, (2005) 40 EHRR 1, [2004] ECHR 294 (24 June 2004)), without reference to the significantly narrower sequel in von Hannover v Germany (No 2) 40660/08 and 60641/08 [2012] ECHR 228 (7 February 2012) and Axel Springer AG v Germany 39954/08 [2012] ECHR 227 (7 February 2012). [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:52 am by INFORRM
In March 2011, when the UK was considering introducing a statutory requirement of serious harm, I wrote: The UK’s Ministry of Justice has announced its long-awaited consultation on the reform of the UK’s libel laws. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Long-standing Irish Government policy is to establish a similar regulator, the Digital Safety Commissioner. [read post]