Search for: "Long v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 46,326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm by MBettman
On June 11, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 11:43 am by Michael Smolensky
Long.1 The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) broke new ground under federal Read more » The post State of New Jersey v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 11:58 am by Bill Ward
Below is the Asbury Park Press video of the court hearing on September 15, featuring the signing of the 12-page settlement agreement in City of Long Branch v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 11:43 am by Michael Smolensky
Long.1 The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) broke new ground under federal Read more » The post State of New Jersey v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:44 am
R (Kelly) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Bailey) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Gibson) v Governor of Wymott Prison [2008] EWCA Civ 177; [2008] WLR (D) 84 “Long-term prisoners who had been convicted of offences committed after 29 September 1998 and before 4 April 2005, and who after 4 April 2005 had been released on licence, recalled and then re-released having served three-quarters of their sentences, remained subject to… [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 3:58 am
Long (University of Connecticut School of Law) has posted Demosprudence, Interactive Federalism, and Twenty Years of Sheff V. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 3:38 pm by Orin Kerr
Back in August, I wrote a long post about the Ninth Circuit's very dubious computer search and seizure decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:41 am by traceydennis
Regina (Abdi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Khalaf) v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 242; [2011] WLR (D) 78 “In deciding whether a foreign national facing deportation had been detained for too long it was right to consider what had happened since the start of the detention and to consider all the relevant factors in the context of the time so far spent in detention and to ask in all the circumstances whether this was a reasonable time for… [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:34 am
Hussain (Zakir) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Evasion of immigration controls for a long time was not in itself a reason for deciding that an applicant, unlawfully in the United Kingdom, should not be allowed to stay. [read post]