Search for: "Loomis v. Loomis"
Results 1 - 20
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2010, 11:08 pm
Loomis, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 7:31 am
Here is the story – well-presented by two lawyers from Williams Mullen – of the Seventh Circuit deciding this month, in the case of Loomis v Exelon Corporation, that holding retail class mutual fund shares, rather than cheaper institutional share classes, in a defined contribution plan was not sufficient to establish fiduciary liability. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:59 am
Case citation: Loomis v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 11:15 pm
Recently, the Fourth District addressed this issue as a matter of first impression in Bolger v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
(Arriaga v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:56 am
” See, e.g., Andes v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:39 pm
Oral Argument in case# 09-4081; Brian Loomis v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:08 am
Loomis, M.D. and Matthew B.... [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:13 am
The abstract provides: In Loomis v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 8:39 am
The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s decision in Fick v Loomis Express, 2022 CHRT 2 (CanLII) confirms that it is not always as it seems. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 2:51 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In her opinion in Stuart v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:23 pm
Loomis: Artificial Intelligence, Government Algorithmization, and Accountability (International Journal of... [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:38 am
BROOKS-ANDERSON v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:00 am
Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, Fact Sheet #17C: Exception for Administrative Employees Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). [3] Loomis v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 4:09 pm
Loomis Armored, Inc., 128 Wash. 2d 931, 935 (1996). [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:17 am
In the case of Loomis v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 11:36 am
Then, last year, in Loomis v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 12:31 pm
12 Sep 2011, 2:26 pm
In Loomis v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 11:12 am
But it also set up a larger contrast Wilson framed for the jury: the empathetic caregiver v. the evasive corporation. [read post]
