Search for: "Loomis v. Loomis" Results 41 - 60 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2016, 7:55 am by Steve Erickson
  In reaching its conclusion that COMPAS does not violate due process by using gender (NB: Loomis did not bring an Equal Protection claim) the court highlights its previous decision in State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 9:12 am by Eric Goldman
The court sidestepped some obviously conflicting precedent, including the Bolger and Loomis cases. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:08 pm by Timothy Edgar
Today’s decision by the European Court of Justice on safe harbor – Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 12:17 pm by Lisa Ouellette
Last Term, the Supreme Court called for the views of the solicitor general in Loomis v. [read post]
21 May 2016, 7:19 am by Alex R. McQuade
Adam Klein provided a few thoughts on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Spokeo v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Elecs., Inc., 41 AD3d 386, 388 [2007]; see also Loomis v Civetta Corinno Constr. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 5:42 am by Jordan Brunner
John Bellinger commented that the Alien Tort Statute case Doe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 10:18 am
" We therefore affirm the trial court.NFP civil opinions today (6): James Loomis v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am by Andrew Kent
But the Court’s 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:42 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Lawrence “Lee” Loomis, Loomis Wealth Solutions, LLC, John Hagener, and Lismar Financial Services, LLCCase Number: 10-cv-00458 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California)Case Filed: February 23, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 21, 2015 3/31/15 6/29/15 2015-34 SEC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 6:17 pm
[Update 11/12/08] I've been looking for this case on PACER, the Bloomberg story identifies it as: "The Bloomberg lawsuit is Bloomberg LP v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Cody M. Poplin
Alex Loomis walked us through the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Weinstein v. [read post]