Search for: "Loomis v. Loomis" Results 41 - 60 of 127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2018, 4:09 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Loomis Armored, Inc., 128 Wash. 2d 931, 935 (1996). [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 12:17 pm by Lisa Ouellette
Last Term, the Supreme Court called for the views of the solicitor general in Loomis v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by John Gregory
Much of the recent debate in the U.S. has focused on the case of Loomis v Wisconsin. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:37 pm by Steve Erickson
   It is also interesting to think of a sentencing decision based largely on a defendant's personality rather than his conduct (even more so given the Supreme Court's recent cert denial in Loomis v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am by Andrew Kent
But the Court’s 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 11:59 am by Alex Potcovaru
Alex Loomis provided a summary of the case. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:21 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Alex Loomis posted a summary of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Ziglar v. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 5:58 am by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
Alex Loomis also analyzed possible impacts of Trump’s tweets on travel ban litigation. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse, Stephen Bainbridge discusses Kokesh v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Alex Loomis considered whether the Supreme Court would extend previous precedents to IRAP v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:39 pm by Jamie Baker
Loomis, The Power to Define Offenses Against the Law of Nations, 40 HARV. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 5:42 am by Jordan Brunner
John Bellinger commented that the Alien Tort Statute case Doe v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm by Jordan Brunner
  John Bellinger commented that the Alien Tort Statute case Doe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
Finally, the justices asked the federal government to file a brief conveying its views on Loomis v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:03 am by Amy Howe
” Finally, the justices asked the federal government to file a brief conveying its views on Loomis v. [read post]