Search for: "Loomis v. Loomis" Results 61 - 80 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2007, 1:26 am
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in Divine v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:25 am by Sheldon Toplitt
The league fined the Saints $500,000, suspended Head Coach Sean Payton without pay for the upcoming NFL season, suspended General Manager Mickey Loomis for half the 2012-2013 season, indefinitely suspended ex-Saints defensive coordinator Gregg Williams from the NFL and suspended Asst. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:37 pm by Steve Erickson
   It is also interesting to think of a sentencing decision based largely on a defendant's personality rather than his conduct (even more so given the Supreme Court's recent cert denial in Loomis v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm by Timothy Edgar
In my last post, I said that the European Court of Justice decision in Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 7:29 am by Alex R. McQuade
Alex Loomis provided a summary brief on Simon v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:33 am
As for civil cases, the Nevada Supreme Court issued a corrective opinion today, which replaces an opinion of the same name filed February 28, 2008: Loomis v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by John Gregory
Much of the recent debate in the U.S. has focused on the case of Loomis v Wisconsin. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 5:58 am by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
Alex Loomis also analyzed possible impacts of Trump’s tweets on travel ban litigation. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse, Stephen Bainbridge discusses Kokesh v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 7:59 pm
"Conclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient" (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Selassie, 166 AD2d 358, 359, lv denied 77 NY2d 911). [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 8:12 am by Jeremy Saland
Furthermore, ‘[c]onclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient’ to establish the value of the property (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Walker, 119 AD3d 1402, 1402-1403; People v Pallagi, 91 AD3d 1266, 1269). [read post]