Search for: "Loomis v. Loomis" Results 61 - 80 of 114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2016, 5:43 am by Steve Vladeck
As Jack noted earlier this morning, Lawfare's Alex Loomis has a fascinating new paper up on SSRN (for the moment, anyway) about the scope of Congress's Article I power to "define and punish . . . [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:55 am by Steve Erickson
  In reaching its conclusion that COMPAS does not violate due process by using gender (NB: Loomis did not bring an Equal Protection claim) the court highlights its previous decision in State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 1:00 pm by Schachtman
See also “The IARC Process is Broken” (May 4, 2016). [2] See Dana Loomis, Kathryn Guyton, Yann Grosse, Béatrice Lauby-Secretan, Fatiha El Ghissassi, Véronique Bouvard, Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa, Neela Guha, Heidi Mattock, Kurt Straifon behalf of the IARC Monograph Working Group, “Carcinogenicity of drinking coffee, mate, and very hot beverages,” Lancet Oncology (2016 in press). [3] IARC, “Coffee, tea, mate, methylxanthines and… [read post]
21 May 2016, 7:19 am by Alex R. McQuade
Adam Klein provided a few thoughts on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Spokeo v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 8:12 am by Jeremy Saland
Furthermore, ‘[c]onclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient’ to establish the value of the property (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Walker, 119 AD3d 1402, 1402-1403; People v Pallagi, 91 AD3d 1266, 1269). [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 8:12 am by Jeremy Saland
Furthermore, ‘[c]onclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient’ to establish the value of the property (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Walker, 119 AD3d 1402, 1402-1403; People v Pallagi, 91 AD3d 1266, 1269). [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 7:29 am by Alex R. McQuade
Alex Loomis provided a summary brief on Simon v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Cody M. Poplin
Alex Loomis walked us through the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Weinstein v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 3:40 pm by Cody M. Poplin
After detection devices around the world picked up a 5.1 seismic event along North Korea’s northeast coast late Tuesday night, North Korea declared that it had tested its first ever hydrogen bomb. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 3:48 am by Elina Saxena
The European Court of Justice ruled against the Safe Harbor framework in Schrems v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm by Timothy Edgar
In my last post, I said that the European Court of Justice decision in Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:01 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
Russia has fired a series of medium range cruise missiles into Syria in what appears to be a coordinated effort to launch a major offensive alongside Syrian ground troops, the New York Times writes. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:08 pm by Timothy Edgar
Today’s decision by the European Court of Justice on safe harbor – Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:34 am by Elina Saxena
Michael Knapp provided a primer on United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
As ever, SCOTUSBlog has the details on the case, Bank Markazi v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:42 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Lawrence “Lee” Loomis, Loomis Wealth Solutions, LLC, John Hagener, and Lismar Financial Services, LLCCase Number: 10-cv-00458 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California)Case Filed: February 23, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 21, 2015 3/31/15 6/29/15 2015-34 SEC v. [read post]