Search for: "Loomis v. Loomis"
Results 61 - 80
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2016, 5:43 am
As Jack noted earlier this morning, Lawfare's Alex Loomis has a fascinating new paper up on SSRN (for the moment, anyway) about the scope of Congress's Article I power to "define and punish . . . [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:55 am
In reaching its conclusion that COMPAS does not violate due process by using gender (NB: Loomis did not bring an Equal Protection claim) the court highlights its previous decision in State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 1:00 pm
See also “The IARC Process is Broken” (May 4, 2016). [2] See Dana Loomis, Kathryn Guyton, Yann Grosse, Béatrice Lauby-Secretan, Fatiha El Ghissassi, Véronique Bouvard, Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa, Neela Guha, Heidi Mattock, Kurt Straifon behalf of the IARC Monograph Working Group, “Carcinogenicity of drinking coffee, mate, and very hot beverages,” Lancet Oncology (2016 in press). [3] IARC, “Coffee, tea, mate, methylxanthines and… [read post]
21 May 2016, 7:19 am
Adam Klein provided a few thoughts on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Spokeo v. [read post]
I was Arrested for Grand Larceny In New York: Challenging Property Value to Lessen Criminal Exposure
5 Apr 2016, 8:12 am
Furthermore, ‘[c]onclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient’ to establish the value of the property (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Walker, 119 AD3d 1402, 1402-1403; People v Pallagi, 91 AD3d 1266, 1269). [read post]
I was Arrested for Grand Larceny In New York: Challenging Property Value to Lessen Criminal Exposure
5 Apr 2016, 8:12 am
Furthermore, ‘[c]onclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient’ to establish the value of the property (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Walker, 119 AD3d 1402, 1402-1403; People v Pallagi, 91 AD3d 1266, 1269). [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 7:29 am
Alex Loomis provided a summary brief on Simon v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am
Alex Loomis walked us through the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Weinstein v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 3:40 pm
After detection devices around the world picked up a 5.1 seismic event along North Korea’s northeast coast late Tuesday night, North Korea declared that it had tested its first ever hydrogen bomb. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
The European Court of Justice ruled against the Safe Harbor framework in Schrems v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm
In my last post, I said that the European Court of Justice decision in Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:01 pm
Russia has fired a series of medium range cruise missiles into Syria in what appears to be a coordinated effort to launch a major offensive alongside Syrian ground troops, the New York Times writes. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:08 pm
Today’s decision by the European Court of Justice on safe harbor – Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:34 am
Michael Knapp provided a primer on United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm
As ever, SCOTUSBlog has the details on the case, Bank Markazi v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 7:50 am
Williams v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:42 am
Lawrence “Lee” Loomis, Loomis Wealth Solutions, LLC, John Hagener, and Lismar Financial Services, LLCCase Number: 10-cv-00458 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California)Case Filed: February 23, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 21, 2015 3/31/15 6/29/15 2015-34 SEC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 6:30 am
The Supreme Court in Cohen v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
" See Gardner v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:41 am
(Hecker I ), 556 F.3d 575, 586 (7th Cir.2009), Loomis v. [read post]
