Search for: "Loomis v. Loomis" Results 81 - 100 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2016, 8:12 am by Jeremy Saland
Furthermore, ‘[c]onclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient’ to establish the value of the property (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Walker, 119 AD3d 1402, 1402-1403; People v Pallagi, 91 AD3d 1266, 1269). [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Alex Loomis considered whether the Supreme Court would extend previous precedents to IRAP v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:03 am by Amy Howe
” Finally, the justices asked the federal government to file a brief conveying its views on Loomis v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:01 pm
Two of our California cases have had a big impact on the way schools in that state and nationwide address the pervasive problem of anti-gay harassment: Loomis v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:21 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Alex Loomis posted a summary of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Ziglar v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 11:59 am by Alex Potcovaru
Alex Loomis provided a summary of the case. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:43 am by Steve Vladeck
As Jack noted earlier this morning, Lawfare's Alex Loomis has a fascinating new paper up on SSRN (for the moment, anyway) about the scope of Congress's Article I power to "define and punish . . . [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 12:02 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Adam Chan discussed how the decision in Torres v. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 1:00 pm by Schachtman
See also “The IARC Process is Broken” (May 4, 2016). [2] See Dana Loomis, Kathryn Guyton, Yann Grosse, Béatrice Lauby-Secretan, Fatiha El Ghissassi, Véronique Bouvard, Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa, Neela Guha, Heidi Mattock, Kurt Straifon behalf of the IARC Monograph Working Group, “Carcinogenicity of drinking coffee, mate, and very hot beverages,” Lancet Oncology (2016 in press). [3] IARC, “Coffee, tea, mate, methylxanthines and… [read post]