Search for: "Lopez v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,570
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2018, 2:58 am
” [Havens v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 7:00 am
Moreover, the court’s jurisdictional analysis was itself faulty and exacerbated by its unsupported belief that plaintiffs had brought their FLSA claims so they could manufacture federal jurisdiction (Lopez Catzin v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:44 am
People v Fenner, 61 NY2d 971, 973, [1984]), the People did not produce the arrest warrant itself prior to the conclusion of the hearing (see Lopez, 206 AD2d at 894; People v McLoyd, 35 Misc 3d 822, 828, 946 N.Y.S.2d 829 [Sup Ct, NY County 2012]). [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 6:33 am
Gonzalez-Lopez. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 8:34 am
As he put it in a concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 10:31 am
Kijowska v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 11:08 am
Facts: This case (LOPEZ v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 11:08 am
Facts: This case (LOPEZ v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 9:20 am
Lopez) * State Laws Restricting Social Media Use by Sex Offenders Are Failing in Court * Banning Sex Offenders from Social Networking Sites is Unconstitutional–Doe v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 1:20 pm
GARY ZARS HOLDIG, LLC V. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:28 am
Alvarez v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
Alvarez v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
Estate of Andy Lopez 17-1354 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
I was expecting the worst when I saw the caption Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Kindred v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:38 pm
Lopez, about Congress’ Article I powers, and for cases like 2001’s Board of Trustees v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:39 am
Gonzlaez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140 (2006). [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:39 am
Estate of Andy Lopez 17-1354 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
United States, 17-7177 Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant has already been convicted of an offense in a state criminal proceeding, the United States may thereafter prosecute the defendant for the same offense without violating the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy. [read post]
