Search for: "Lopez v. U.s.*" Results 1 - 20 of 282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2007, 2:21 pm
See, e.g., Clinton v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 2:03 pm
If a bank account has a negative balance resulting from paying overdrafts and overdraft fees, the bank cannot apply a future direct deposit of Social Security or V.A. benefits to make up the deficit balance owed to the bank.The court analyzed Sections 407(a) and 1383(d)(1) of 42 U.S.C., which prohibit creditors from reaching Social Security or SSI benefits by levies, garnishments, or "other legal process," and decided that these sections do not allow a bank to apply a future… [read post]