Search for: "Lopez v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 1,016
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  On Tuesday I attended a hearing called by the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to examine women’s freedoms, focusing on access to abortions across the United States two years after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm by Josh Blackman
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
Pereira before him, had lived in the United States for less than 10 years when he was served with an NTA. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
Reaction against the laws has been swift with Texas Democrats calling the bill “the most extreme anti-immigrant state bill in the United States,” and immigrant rights groups have sued to halt the law. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Lopez (invalidating the Gun Free School Zones Act as beyond the scope of Congressional power) and Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 11:24 am by Joel R. Brandes
In short, the Amber Alert was no evidence that A.B.M. was (or remains) outside of Mexico, let alone that she was (or remains) in the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
From the moment the Supreme Court granted cert in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 7:17 pm by Michael Lowe
Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc., 770 F.2d 399, 407 (4th Cir. 1985) and United States v. [read post]