Search for: "Lord v. Lord"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2009, 2:19 pm
The Lord President Lord Hamilton & the Lord Justice Clerk, Lord Gill appeared before the Scottish Parliament's Justice Committee to discuss, and criticise some of the plans contained in Criminal Justice and Licensing Scotland Bill, particularly those plans relating to the ‘Sentencing Council', an idea from the Scottish Government to give communities and victims a say in the recommended lengths of… [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Pribetic for his post on the case of the day, Sanchez v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 9:23 am
Author: Paul Hurst Licence CC BY-SA 2.5 Deed Source Wikimedia CommonsJane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lord Justices Lewison, Arnold and Birss) Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores Ltd and Another (Rev1) [2024] EWCA Civ 262 (19 March 2024)This is the second of my supplementary articles on Lord Justice Jackson's judgment in Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 7:41 am
v=EHRmi26qFAA [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 5:08 am
The Law Lords are back with their first judgments of the new year - in a private international law Lugano Convention case, Phillips v Syme, and in a VAT case, Fleming and Condé Nast v HMRC. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:05 am
On 5 March the Supreme Court hears KAS or H v The Lord Advocate & Anor, BH v The Lord Advocate & Anor. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 2:58 am
I was at a conference yesterday, which is why I didn't blog about yesterday's Lords judgment in A v Hoare and related appeals, in which they ruled that civil claims for damages can be made out of time in some circumstances in cases of rape and sexual assault. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:01 am
On 27 and 28 March 2017, the Supreme Court heard the appeal of R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor & Another in which it considered whether the order imposing fees in the employment tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal is indirectly discriminatory and whether it breaches the EU principle of effectiveness. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 4:42 am
With reference to judicial inconsistency on a point of disclosure in the judgment of Vernon v Bosley , Lord Neuberger then demonstrated that litigation best practice had in some areas been left in a “state of complete uncertainty”. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:40 am
Lawcast 141: The House of Lords judgment on control orders Today I am talking to Carl Gardner, ex government lawyer and author of the Head of Legal blog about the House of Lords judgment in Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v AF (Appellant) (FC) and another (Appellant) and one other action Lord [...] [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 5:57 am
Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lord Justices Lewison, Arnold and Birss) Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores Ltd and Another (Rev1) [2024] EWCA Civ 262 (19 March 2024)This is the third of my supplementary articles on Lord Justice Jackson's judgment in Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores Ltd and Another (Rev1) [2024] EWCA Civ 262 (19 March 2024). [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:57 am
This morning the House of Lords, looking slightly unfamiliar without Lord Hoffmann in the line-up, gave its decision in Generics (UK) Limited and others v H Lundbeck A/S [2009] UKHL 12, dismissing Generics' appeal against the much-discussed decision of the Court of Appeal (equally unfamiliar with Lord Hofffmann in the starring role) on the application of the concept of "insufficiency" to the validity of a granted patent.In short, their Lordships --… [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:19 am
Although in the minority in Roberts Lord Bingham’s views must have coloured and informed the House of Lords when, after Lord Bingham’s retirement, they considered the approach to closed evidence in control order proceedings in AF (No.3) v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 2:26 am
Regina (Patel) v Lord Chancellor [2010] EWHC 2220 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 240 “An applicant for exceptional funding by way of legal aid had to meet a high threshold to satisfy the test of ‘significant wider public interest’ in para 27.2.8 of the Legal Services Commission’s Funding Code Decision Making Guidance, subject to the latitude (or margin of discretion) accorded to the Lord Chancellor in the exercise of his judgment. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 10:54 am
On the day when the Law Lords bade farewell to the House of Lords and sit as Justices of the Supreme Court of the United kingdom at the new Supreme Court in October, they gave judgment on one of the emotive issues of our times in R (on the application of Purdy) v Director of [...] [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:14 am
Regina (Law Society) v Lord Chancellor [2010] EWHC 1406; [2010] WLR (D) 151 “When exercising the discretionary power to make provision for scales or rates of payments of any costs payable out of central funds to successful defendants in criminal trials pursuant to ss 16(6) and 20 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, as amended, the Lord Chancellor had to base the rules on the principle of compensation taking into account prevailing market rates. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am
This is relevant to the judgment in Patel v Mirza (which had not been released at the date of our interview) relating to illegality: “The whole issue of how the Courts approach illegality as a defence to claims in contract and tort has been, to a degree, shaped by the Law Commission’s work on that area of law. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 10:19 am
Kay (Fc) V Commissioner of The Police of The Metropolis Appellate Committee Lord Phill [2008] UKHL 69 (26 November 2008) R (On The Application of Jl) V Secretary of State For Justice Appellate Committee Lord [2008] UKHL 68 (26 November 2008) Source: www.parliament.uk [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:38 pm
The other interesting judgment from the Lords in what Joshua Rozenberg thinks must have been a record output yesterday was in R (Baiai) v Home Secretary. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:45 pm
The Lords have unanimously [read post]
