Search for: "Lord v. Lord" Results 21 - 40 of 6,591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2015, 7:03 am by Daily Record Staff
Contracts breach — Breach — Treating salary as commission Christopher Lord, appellant, appeals the entry of judgment against him and in favor of his former employer, Hannon Armstrong Capital, LLC (“Hannon Armstrong”), appellee, in Lord’s suit seeking damages for Hannon Armstrong’s alleged failure to pay him certain commissions and bonuses. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 2:58 am by tortsprof
Atkin is best known for his 1932 judgment in Donoghue v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:29 am by Rachel Price, Olswang LLP
Lord Reed will begin sitting tomorrow (Tuesday 7 February) among a panel of five Justices sitting as the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council hearing a planning dispute case over the commercial development of ‘New Kingston’ in Jamaica, in J & O Operations Limited and another; Eloise Mulligan and Grace Wong (Appellants) v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 6:09 am
Hot off the press, the ruling of the House of Lords in the case of Douglas v Hello! [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:00 pm
He was not always a bold judge, as is especially evident from his contribution to Liversidge v. [read post]
  Most recently of all, in Nicklinson (Nicklinson and Lamb v the United Kingdom), the ECtH [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 3:26 am
First, Ward v PSNI, in which the Lords ruled that it was lawful, under the Terrorism Act 2000, for a judge considering an extension of detention, so that the police could put new matters to a suspect in interview, to exclude the suspect and his lawyers from the hearing so as to make sure the questions would be on genuinely new matters while avoiding prejudice to the police [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:44 am by Legal Beagle
The move brings the Lord President into line with the wishes of the Scottish Government, who fell over themselves to castigate the UK’s Supreme Court and even it’s Scottish judges after rulings in the Cadder v HMA case and Nat Fraser appeal.The Lord President’s representations to Westminster can be read online HERENow that the Lord President has ‘rolled over’ to make a judicial request to back up the harsh words from Scottish… [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:15 am by Emma Emery
Having recently given judgment in the Mitchell v MGN case on relief from sanction he was a man everyone wanted to meet and the courtroom in our state of the art Civil Justice Centre (described by Lord Dyson as second to none) was packed. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:15 am by Emma Emery
Having recently given judgment in the Mitchell v MGN case on relief from sanction he was a man everyone wanted to meet and the courtroom in our state of the art Civil Justice Centre (described by Lord Dyson as second to none) was packed. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:21 am by Karon Monaghan QC
Judgment has now been handed down in R (Public Law Project) v Lord Chancellor [2016] UKSC 39, in which Regulations made under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) were challenged. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 4:56 am by Jamie Abrams
Phil Lord has published Trumping Dobbs in the University of Illinois Law Review Online (2023). [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 7:42 am
The Lords gave judgment yesterday in this complex case, about confiscation of the proceeds of drugs offences. [read post]
27 Nov 2008, 12:53 pm
The other Lords judgment yesterday came in this interesting case about section 11 of the Public Order Act 1986, and whether Critical Mass is a procession requiring to be notified to the police, or is exempt under subsection (2) as a procession which is "commonly or customarily held". [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:26 pm
Further to this morning's earlier posts (see immediately below), the IPKat can now say a bit about the approach taken by the House of Lords to the proper test of inventive step in Conor Medsystems Inc v Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:15 am by sally
Regina (Humberstone) v Legal Services Commission (Lord Chancellor intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 1479; [2010] WLR (D) 346 “The state’s obligation to conduct an effective investigation into a death (with the associated possible necessity to provide representation) did not arise in all cases where a death occurred while the deceased was in the care of the state but only in a much narrower range of cases where it was arguable that the state had breached its substantive… [read post]