Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,013
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2012, 2:05 am
On 5 March the Supreme Court hears KAS or H v The Lord Advocate & Anor, BH v The Lord Advocate & Anor. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
The Prosecutor v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 2:27 am
The judgments in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (McGeogh) v The Lord President of the Council and Another (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 63 were handed down in October 2013. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:31 am
R (Barclay and others) v Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice and others [2008] EWCA Civ 1319; [2008] WLR (D) 376 “The Reform (Sark) Law 2008, which, inter alia, provided, in relation to the Island of Sark, a Crown Dependency and a part of the Bailiwick of Guernsey, for the Seneschal, the senior judge [...] [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 9:50 am
Regina (Barclay and Others) v Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice and Others Court of Appeal “Proposed reform of the constitution of the Channel Island of Sark which allowed the Seneschal, appointed by the Seigneur, to be both a member of the legislature and the chief judge, contravened article 6 of the European Convention on [...] [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am
In R (Lord Carlile of Berriew CBE QC and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 617 (Admin), the Divisional Court upheld, with evident reluctance, the Home Secretary’s decision to exclude Maryam Rajavi, “an eminent dissident Iranian politician”, from the UK – denying her the opportunity from meeting in the Palace of Westminster with 16 prominent cross-party members of the House of Lords and the House of Commons to… [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:46 am
R (Barclay and others) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice and others [2009] UKSC 9; [2009] WLR (D) 349 "The presence of two unelected non-voting members in the legislature of the Channel Island of Sark, which had 28 democratically elected voting members, did not contravene art 3 of the First Protocol to [...] [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:40 am
Lawcast 141: The House of Lords judgment on control orders Today I am talking to Carl Gardner, ex government lawyer and author of the Head of Legal blog about the House of Lords judgment in Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v AF (Appellant) (FC) and another (Appellant) and one other action Lord [...] [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:23 am
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 63 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice; McGeoch v The Lord President of the Council & Anor [2013] UKSC 63 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:41 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3); Same v AN; Same v AE House of Lords “Where, in the interests of national security, the Secretary of State for the Home Department wanted to rely on closed material in a terror-suspect hearing to justify his decision to make a control order, the controlled person [...] [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 10:19 am
Kay (Fc) V Commissioner of The Police of The Metropolis Appellate Committee Lord Phill [2008] UKHL 69 (26 November 2008) R (On The Application of Jl) V Secretary of State For Justice Appellate Committee Lord [2008] UKHL 68 (26 November 2008) Source: www.parliament.uk [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am
[1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless there were other aggravating… [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:15 am
Regina (Humberstone) v Legal Services Commission (Lord Chancellor intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 1479; [2010] WLR (D) 346 “The state’s obligation to conduct an effective investigation into a death (with the associated possible necessity to provide representation) did not arise in all cases where a death occurred while the deceased was in the care of the state but only in a much narrower range of cases where it was arguable that the state had… [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
Original Supreme Court decision However, the House of Lords allowed the appeal by a majority of 3 to 2 in R (Bancoult) v Foreign Secretary (No 2) [2008] UKHL 61. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:21 am
Judgment has now been handed down in R (Public Law Project) v Lord Chancellor [2016] UKSC 39, in which Regulations made under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) were challenged. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 1:09 pm
Lord v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:19 am
Although in the minority in Roberts Lord Bingham’s views must have coloured and informed the House of Lords when, after Lord Bingham’s retirement, they considered the approach to closed evidence in control order proceedings in AF (No.3) v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
They argued that this was the necessary implication of the finding of the Supreme Court in the case of Munir v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2192 and Alvi (which were heard together) that the power of the Secretary of State to make or vary the Immigration Rules was wholly statutory and not an exercise of prerogative power: [27]. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:44 am
Background This case concerns the House of Lords’ judgment in R (Bancoult No 2) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] UKHL 61 and its interaction with the plight of the former inhabitants of the Chagos Islands, a tiny archipelago of coral atolls in the Indian Ocean. [read post]
