Search for: "Lori Ringhand and Paul Collins"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2010, 5:34 pm
Ringhand, Paul M. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:43 am
On the eve of another Supreme Court confirmation hearing, Professors Paul Collins and Lori Ringhand have published an interesting study comparing nominees’ responsiveness to questions by the Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:56 am
Ringhand and Paul M. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 5:46 am
Ringhand and Paul M. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 6:12 pm
Collins Jr. and law professor Lori A. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:17 am
Ringhand (UGa) and Paul M. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 7:06 am
Paul Collins, Jr. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:41 am
Today's New York Times has a long article (here) discussing the empirical work of Feminist Law Professor Lori Ringhand (University of Georgia) and her co-author Paul M. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:27 am
Ringhand and Collins, on the other hand, view the Bork hearing as less than an outlier, at least based upon the questioning he received. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:26 am
Lori A. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:00 am
Collins Jr. and Lori A. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 10:48 am
Lori Ringhand is J. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:01 pm
Coverage of the hearing comes from Matt Flegenheimer and others in The New York Times, Seung Min Kim and Josh Gerstein at Politico, Rebecca Wilhelm at Bloomberg BNA, who focuses on Gorsuch’s views on Chevron deference, Benjamin Wermund at Politico, and Lisa Soronen at the National Conference of State Legislatures blog, who writes about what Gorsuch had to say about issues affecting state and local governments, Commentary comes from Andrew Cohen in Esquire, Ilya Shapiro in the Washington… [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:02 pm
In short, Judge Gorsuch followed the by-now standard script to the letter.A Civics LessonIn an opinion column about a year ago, Professors Paul Collins and Lori Ringhand called into question the conventional wisdom that confirmation hearings are uninformative. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:38 am
Collins & Lori A. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 4:15 am
Collins Jr. and Lori Ringhand, in a recent analysis, noted that Thurgood Marshall’s 1967 confirmation hearing was marked by extended questions related to the Warren Court. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am
Law professor Lori Ringhand and political scientist Paul Collins, in their excellent book Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change, report their findings from a large-scale qualitative and quantitative analysis of the hearings. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:36 am
Dionne at The Washington Post, Michelangelo Signorile at The Huffington Post, Paul Collins and Lori Ringhand at Slate, Seth Davis at PrawfsBlawg, Rick Hasen at the Election Law Blog, and Carolyn Shapiro at the ACS Blog. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:32 am
In a very interesting 2018 study in the Chicago-Kent Law Review, Neil Gorsuch and the Ginsburg Rules, Lori Ringhand and Paul Collins show that to an unusually extreme extent Neil Gorsuch was unwilling to recognize even historical cases as “settled law. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 12:48 pm
As scholars Paul Collins and Lori Ringhand have shown in a series of articles (for example), much can be learned about what we can expect from studying past confirmation hearings. [read post]
