Search for: "Los Angeles v. Los Angeles City Water Co." Results 21 - 40 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization Symposium on  Alexander Keyssar, Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm by Nossaman LLP
City of Los Angeles, he argued that because the State’s expert did not quantify damages, there was insufficient evidence to survive a directed verdict. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Chicago (2010), the case that fully incorporated the Second Amendment. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
City of Irvine (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 1110 (“Royalty”) and Friends of Riverside’s Hills v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Grant Hayden
In fact, the Supreme Court tackled a closely related issue in case that’s now more than four decades old: Los Angeles Department of Water & Power v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Crane, 50 Mich 182, 15 NW 73 (1883); Grand Rapids, etc R Co v Cheseboro, 74 Mich 466; 42 NW 66 (1889); Union Depot Co v Backus, 92 Mich 34; 52 NW 790 (1892). [read post]
Water Supply Impacts – The Final Text clarifies the standards for an adequate water supply assessment, including an analysis of possible sources of water supply over the life of a project and the environmental impacts of supplying that water to that project. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 2:56 am by Jon L. Gelman
"The court’s action closes a key chapter in an 18-year legal battle waged by 10 California cities and counties, including Los Angeles County and the city of San Diego. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
American Express Co., which involves the application of antitrust law to credit-card-network anti-steering rules. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” And in an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Erwin Chemerinsky weighs in on Ayestas, arguing that “[n]o one should face execution because they’re too poor to put on a defense. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
 It's absurd that Los Angeles has a law that allows the city to impound a vehicle for 30 days -- a minimum of 30 days -- when it's driven by an unlicensed driver. [read post]