Search for: "Los Angeles v. Patel" Results 1 - 20 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Miller, Patel, and McCarthy have been viewed as crucial witnesses for understanding government’s response to the assault and former President Trump’s reaction to the breach. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 3:05 pm by Josh Blackman
Don't forget Justice Scalia's barb from his dissent in Los Angeles v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am by Bernard Bell
  In upholding the tracking requirement, the focus of this post, the Court discussed the Supreme Court’s most recent major administrative search case, Los Angeles v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am by SCOTUStalk
This is Tom Goldstein and Justice David Souter in Georgia v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:20 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
In that case, Balubhai Patel and his company, DTWO & E (collectively “Patel”) owned a residential hotel in Los Angeles where Chavez worked as an on-site property manager. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 9:11 am by Eric Goldman
This lawsuit relates to 924 Bel Air Road in Los Angeles, a house known as “Billionaire” (seriously, who chose that brand???). [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Times has agreed to apologies and  pay damages to Iman Abdullah Patel. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” David Savage of the Los Angeles Times echoes that the “Supreme Court term that ended last week gave a preview of the new era ahead. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Gelblum, Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Los Angeles, California; Carey R. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh and Paul Alan Levy
The docket does not report that the hearing was ever held; instead, a similar case is then filed in Los Angeles County, also far from the scene of the underlying incident, with the same plaintiff and the same defendant. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
2016 has been a tough year for Section 230 jurisprudence, and the nadir (so far) was the appellate court ruling in Hassell v. [read post]