Search for: "Los Angeles v. Patel" Results 21 - 40 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2015, 2:28 pm by Hadar Aviram
As Jason Miller's explains in his useful note in the Seton Hall Circuit Review, while the Fourth Amendment principles behind hotel room searches are the same as behind any search (reasonable expectation of privacy awards standing for overnight guests), but hotels pose special fact-sensitive challenges, including registration under an alias, registration for a third party, paying with a fradulent credit card, exceeding checkout time, and the classic from Minnesota v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:40 am by Amy Howe
Abrahamson; and City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
The Supreme Court has granted cert in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 1:09 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summaries are from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Los Angeles v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:19 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Adam Lamparello (Indiana Tech - Law School) has posted City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:45 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Along with the underlying Fourth Amendment question, Los Angeles v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:20 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
In that case, Balubhai Patel and his company, DTWO & E (collectively “Patel”) owned a residential hotel in Los Angeles where Chavez worked as an on-site property manager. [read post]